Subject: Violent Rhetoric. To anyone who has not lost their minds to the New World Order.
71. Threatening public officers and employees and school officials
Every person who, with intent to cause, attempts to cause, or causes, any officer or employee of any public or private educational institution or any public officer or employee to do, or refrain from doing, any act in the performance of his duties, by means of a threat, directly communicated to such person, to inflict an unlawful injury upon any person or property, and it reasonably appears to the recipient of the threat that such threat could be carried out, is guilty of a public offense punishable as follows:
(1) Upon a first conviction, such person is punishable by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(2) If such person has been previously convicted of a violation of this section, such previous conviction shall be charged in the accusatory pleading, and if such previous conviction is found to be true by the jury, upon a jury trial, or by the court, upon a court trial, or is admitted by the defendant, he is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison.
As used in this section, "directly communicated" includes, but is not limited to, a communication to the recipient of the threat by telephone, telegraph, or letter.
Maxine Waters (excerpted)
During the Los Angeles riots in the wake of the infamous 1992Rodney King trial, Waters described the violence (in which 58 people were killed) as "a spontaneous reaction to a lot of injustice." She held "economic, social, cultural and political" factors responsible for the disorder. She dismissed the mass black looting of Korean-owned stores by saying: "There were mothers who took this as an opportunity to take some milk, to take some bread, to take some shoes…. They are not crooks." Chanting the radical slogan "No justice, no peace," she attributed the rioters' underlying rage to the federal government's allegedly longstanding "neglect" of America's inner cities.
Fifty-three people died in Congresswoman Waters' "spontaneous reaction to...injustice". A U.S. Congresswoman! Treason? Hmmmmm... at the leadership level, certainly.
The "intolerant", "contemptible" Bible says:
2Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment:
Prohibits participation in "mob rule" or its more palatable moniker: "democracy".
The rioters who chanted "no justice, no peace" while inflicting unlawful injuries upon persons and property in Los Angeles in 1992 were in violation of the Ca. Penal Code Section 71 cited above. ("Directly communicated" is not limited to communication " by telephone, telegraph, or letter". Televised news broadcast certainly qualifies.) They were not satisfied with the first "Rodney King Verdict" and were demanding another. They got one. In what can hardly be described as not violating the "double jeopardy" clause of the U.S. Constitution, the officers involved were charged with "violating Rodney King's civil rights" in another court venue. (The "O.J. Simpson Civil Trial" took this Austro-marsupial "double jeopardy" -skirting venue-hopping to the jurisprudential "crush depth' of "following a multitude to do evil" and "declining after many to wrest judgment". This using of the legal apparatus to "get" people is a grand tradition in the history of Judeo-Christian jurisprudence. Another instance of this phenomenon is related below. It puts me in rare company.)
I am intimate with Ca. Penal Code Section 71 because, at the height of the O.J. Simpson murder extravaganza, in an ex parte communication to the family law referee presiding over my divorce from my first wife, I expressed exactly the same kind of between-the-eyes criticism of an assistant district attorney named Shelly Miller, who shared the same surname with my ex-wife's then-current husband, Steve, and who had charged me with violating (by communicating by mail) a court order that my ex-wife had obtained by perjury over a year earlier, of which perjury I had filed proof in a Responsive Declaration with a motion to have the perjured court order thrown out. The "Long Cause Hearing" postponing action on the pleadings was scheduled for March 20, 1995. The date for me to appear as a defendant charged with violating the court order was scheduled prior to that date but subsequent to the filing of the Responsive Declaration proving that it was obtained by perjury. As a consequence of the ex parte communication to the family law referee,I was arrested on March 17, 1995 and charged with a violation of P.C. 71 with regard to Shelly Miller. At no time did I communicate with Shelly Miller. In no way did I indicate what she was to do or refrain from doing in the performance of her duties.I explicitly stated in the communication that it was not a threat to any person. I simply ridiculed her actions and the obvious flaws in the underlying reasoning in filing charges against me without taking me into custody if I was, in fact, truly dangerous, which, in light of the super-fucking human restraint I have demonstrated in the face of violations of my rights and person that would leave lesser, faith-lacking human beings babbling incoherently or the subjects of news stories about some explosion of violence, or both, I am obviously not. Not in the sense of "inflicting unlawful injury upon any person or property", that is. I am also obviously not "over it". My ex-wife, through her attorney, used the legal system to "get" me, because the fact that I had rights as a citizen, a parent, and a Christian man, had become an impediment to what she wanted out of her life, which was me and my rights. The Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office set about turning me into a criminal for that purpose. I went to honest- to-God Level III prison for not doing what the rioters in Los Angeles in 1992 did do, and they got public officials "to do, or to refrain from doing" something in the performance of their duties, which was to try the policemen again for the same offense, which was beating Rodney King.
Which brings me to the subject of this email: Violent Rhetoric.
On the one hand, you have Keith Olbermann with
Appearing on a special edition of "Countdown," Olbermann told his audience that "we need to put the guns down. Just as importantly we need to put the gun metaphors away and permanently."
He concluded his special comment with this powerful statement, including an apology for his own actions: "Violence, or the threat of violence, has no place in our Democracy, and I apologize for and repudiate any act or any thing in my past that may have even inadvertently encouraged violence. Because for whatever else each of us may be, we all are Americans."
On the other hand, you have Glenn Beck's letter to the American people, politicians, and media:
I challenge all Americans, left or right, regardless if you're a politician, pundit, painter, priest, parishioner, poet or porn star to agree with all of the following.
- I denounce violence, regardless of ideological motivation.
- I denounce anyone, from the Left, the Right or middle, who believes physical violence is the answer to whatever they feel is wrong with our country.
- I denounce those who wish to tear down our system and rebuild it in their own image, whatever that image may be.
- I denounce those from the Left, the Right or middle, who call for riots and violence as an opportunity to bring down and reconstruct our system.
- I denounce violent threats and calls for the destruction of our system – regardless of their underlying ideology – whether they come from the Hutaree Militia or Frances Fox Piven.
- I hold those responsible for the violence, responsible for the violence. I denounce those who attempt to blame political opponents for the acts of madmen.
- I denounce those from the Left, the Right or middle that sees violence as a viable alternative to our long established system of change made within the constraints of our constitutional Republic.
The First Amendment provides for the right of the People to "peacably assemble". Implicitly prohibits violence. The U.S. Constitution begins with the words "We the People of the United States,..." which means it applies to all of us. The distinction between protected speech and incitement to violence is basic civics and common sense. The reason a Keith Olbermann and a Glenn Beck are not laughed off the air out of hand is because basic civics and common sense have been supplanted by a literally diabolical program of obliterating every Judeo-Christian decalogical notion of right and wrong with a contrarian rejection of anything that expresses the authority of objective truth. The result is that instead of a universal recognition of and agreement with the meaning and authority of the First Amendment (the rule of law), we have a population polarized by men like Olbermann and Beck, who call everything into doubt so that they can operate above the law, while the rest of us are crushed beneath it (the rule of "special" persons, or oligarchy. )
There is already a distinction in the law between "free speech" and "incitement to violence". Keith Olbermann and his comrades' endeavor to erase that distinction is a frontal assault on the First Amendment. They are enemies of it. Engaged in unconventional, psychological warfare against it. That is Treason. They have soaked their paintbrushes in the blood of Jared Loughner's victims and are writing "helter skelter" all over the First Amendment and Americans who advocate a return to Constitutional rule such as the "Tea Party". (Apparently, Jared Loughner questioned the validity of U.S. currency, among other things. Only "dangerous, violent" people do that! You're not one of those "dangerous, violent" people, are you?One of those "nutjobs" who view federal reserve notes as an economic weapon of war contrived for the hostile takeover and destruction of the private sector or free enterprise system ?) Glenn Beck and his comrades refuse to call what is being done Treason. That is also Treason.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
"Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people to surrender their interests." - George Washington.
(Mr. Beck, you have just been transported through a "wormhole" to total irrelevance. One must have some idea of what one is doing in order to "lead". Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.)
This "debate" about "violent rhetoric" is a pretext for further alienating the American People from their Constitutional Rights and a smoke screen to evade the First Amendment Petition entitled "Operation Broken Arrow". It also belabors the need for such drastic intervention in the nation's public policy, which is absolutely rooted in endemic, perpetual, and evermore monopolistic and pervasive Treason.
Some bedrock provisions of law in the U.S. Constitution that have been abrogated in fact while being reduced to shuttlecocks in the badminton court of public opinion:
- No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.
- The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. (If the government cannot engage in the business of education without prohibiting the free exercise of religion or abridging freedom of speech, then it is unconstitutional for the government to be in the business of education. It is not unconstitutional to teach creation or to pray in school. Such judicial rulings are warfare against the First Amendment and as such are Treason.)
1Behold, the LORD's hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear:
2But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.
3For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.
4None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity.
5They hatch cockatrice' eggs, and weave the spider's web: he that eateth of their eggs dieth, and that which is crushed breaketh out into a viper.
6Their webs shall not become garments, neither shall they cover themselves with their works: their works are works of iniquity, and the act of violence is in their hands.
7Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood: their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths.
8The way of peace they know not; and there is no judgment in their goings: they have made them crooked paths: whosoever goeth therein shall not know peace.
9Therefore is judgment far from us, neither doth justice overtake us: we wait for light, but behold obscurity; for brightness, but we walk in darkness.
10We grope for the wall like the blind, and we grope as if we had no eyes: we stumble at noon day as in the night; we are in desolate places as dead men.
11We roar all like bears, and mourn sore like doves: we look for judgment, but there is none; for salvation, but it is far off from us.
12For our transgressions are multiplied before thee, and our sins testify against us: for our transgressions are with us; and as for our iniquities, we know them;
13In transgressing and lying against the LORD, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood.
14And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.
15Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey: and the LORD saw it, and it displeased him that there was no judgment.
16And he saw that there was no man, and wondered that there was no intercessor: therefore his arm brought salvation unto him; and his righteousness, it sustained him.
17For he put on righteousness as a breastplate, and an helmet of salvation upon his head; and he put on the garments of vengeance for clothing, and was clad with zeal as a cloak.
18According to their deeds, accordingly he will repay, fury to his adversaries, recompence to his enemies; to the islands he will repay recompence.
19So shall they fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun. When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him.
20And the Redeemer shall come to Zion, and unto them that turn from transgression in Jacob, saith the LORD.
21As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed's seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.